View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002608 | HTML & PERL | Feature Request - Interface | public | 2016-09-18 18:01 | 2016-10-13 23:34 |
| Reporter | CDB-Man | Assigned To | DerIdiot | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Fixed in Version | 2016-11 | ||||
| Summary | 0002608: Extra clarity for relation creqs | ||||
| Description | 7[01:56:59] CDB-Man: !c 8160543 8[01:57:00] @Chii[AR]: CREQID: The creq # 8160543, was issued by Mortsyn, on 13.09.2016, and has the state: GRANTED, url: http://anidb.net/c8160543 7[01:57:21] CDB-Man: i find it confusing that the type field is describing the relation of the Other AID, instead of the AID 7[01:57:57] CDB-Man: ie, 9031 is the prequel of 10535, but reading that creq, it looks to say 10535 is the prequel of 9031 instead ===== Possible solutions: a) in the creq details, rename "Type" to "Type of Other AID" to make it more clear b) do both of: -- 1) "Type" should reflect the type of the main AID, at least in my opinion that is what most people would read it as -- 2) rename "Type" to "Type of main AID" Both would make it much more clear. The same should apply for other relation type creqs, ie char-char-rel, song-song-rel, etc, rel creqs where it's the same entity type on both sides. Something like charanimerel should be obvious enough. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
