View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0002608||HTML & PERL||Feature Request - Interface||public||2016-09-18 18:01||2016-10-13 23:34|
|Fixed in Version||2016-11|
|Summary||0002608: Extra clarity for relation creqs|
|Description||7[01:56:59] CDB-Man: !c 8160543|
8[01:57:00] @Chii[AR]: CREQID: The creq # 8160543, was issued by Mortsyn, on 13.09.2016, and has the state: GRANTED, url: http://anidb.net/c8160543
7[01:57:21] CDB-Man: i find it confusing that the type field is describing the relation of the Other AID, instead of the AID
7[01:57:57] CDB-Man: ie, 9031 is the prequel of 10535, but reading that creq, it looks to say 10535 is the prequel of 9031 instead
a) in the creq details, rename "Type" to "Type of Other AID" to make it more clear
b) do both of:
-- 1) "Type" should reflect the type of the main AID, at least in my opinion that is what most people would read it as
-- 2) rename "Type" to "Type of main AID"
Both would make it much more clear. The same should apply for other relation type creqs, ie char-char-rel, song-song-rel, etc, rel creqs where it's the same entity type on both sides. Something like charanimerel should be obvious enough.
|Tags||No tags attached.|