View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000177HTML & PERLBug Report - Databasepublic2006-01-16 16:12
Reporterpetriw Assigned Toexp  
PrioritynormalSeveritycrashReproducibilityhave not tried
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
Summary0000177: Using ignore on all group select boxes causes null in database.
Descriptionhttp://anidb.info/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=creq&do.showhist=1&creq.id=139848

This breaks aom and it's now also crept into the dump files, please recreate.
Suggested solution:
Set gid column to NOT NULL.
Set gid column to default 0.

^^;
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

DerIdiot

2005-05-17 22:31

administrator   ~0000465

this seems to become a daily problem. 3 times in 2 weeks. considering the update is 3 times per week that means 50%. quite a bad value....

Tomynocker

2005-07-25 20:38

reporter   ~0000622

was this the problem for aom not starting around 22.7.05? if yes then this should be fixed as soon as possibe.

pelican

2005-07-25 21:58

administrator   ~0000629

Oh dear, I thought that ignore in all group fields was the normal way to add a `no group' file...

Tomynocker

2005-07-28 00:25

reporter   ~0000641

it seems like it happened again ... *bump*

exp

2005-08-14 13:42

administrator   ~0000647

could anyone check if this does still happen?

Tomynocker

2005-08-16 21:46

reporter   ~0000650

Last edited: 2005-08-16 21:48

right now aom is working (the latest release) so it seems like it's fixed (in case there's still a corrupted entry in the db. if there isn't then there's no way how i could check if it still breaks aom ^^ )

thanx a lot

petriw

2005-08-17 06:28

administrator   ~0000651

This bug doesn't affect aom anymore and hasn't for quite a while.
So you can't use aom to test it.

Rar

2005-08-18 16:00

reporter   ~0000652

Can someone not run a query on the file table to see if there are any nulls in group? Should be trivial task for either exp or petri.

exp

2005-08-21 09:50

administrator   ~0000658

SELECT id FROM filetb WHERE gid IS NULL;
 id
----
(0 rows)

I already checked that before, what I was interested in is if it is possible to produce new entries with gid NULL atm.

Rar

2005-08-22 02:15

reporter   ~0000663

Ah. 'no' then, not via the normal interface. I can *try* and sneak a null in, if you like :D

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2005-05-14 17:47 petriw New Issue
2005-05-17 22:31 DerIdiot Note Added: 0000465
2005-07-25 20:38 Tomynocker Note Added: 0000622
2005-07-25 21:58 pelican Note Added: 0000629
2005-07-28 00:25 Tomynocker Note Added: 0000641
2005-08-14 13:42 exp Note Added: 0000647
2005-08-16 21:46 Tomynocker Note Added: 0000650
2005-08-16 21:47 Tomynocker Note Edited: 0000650
2005-08-16 21:48 Tomynocker Note Edited: 0000650
2005-08-17 06:28 petriw Note Added: 0000651
2005-08-18 16:00 Rar Note Added: 0000652
2005-08-21 09:50 exp Note Added: 0000658
2005-08-22 02:15 Rar Note Added: 0000663
2006-01-16 11:42 DerIdiot Status new => resolved
2006-01-16 11:42 DerIdiot Resolution open => fixed
2006-01-16 11:42 DerIdiot Assigned To => DerIdiot
2006-01-16 16:12 DerIdiot Assigned To DerIdiot => exp