|
|
The only case where I consider the data in the quality field to be potentially useful is for files tagged as corrupted. Some of these should be linked to their original or fixed versions through file relations. Others however seem to be just nitpicking over a single frame (http://anidb.net/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=file&fid=336017). |
|
|
Aha, finally found the creq I saw with some relevant discussion on this topic: http://anidb.net/c6389704 |
|
|
I haven't seen this supposed convention being followed on any shows consistently, and it isn't documented anywhere either. If we went by that, would that mean a 480p BD rip gets 2½ stars while a (potentially older) DVD rip gets 3? That doesn't make any sense. Or should all the old DVD rips get dropped in quality if there is a BD? That would be inefficient. (In some cases, the BDs are also terrible upscales and should have lower quality ratings than the DVDs, e.g. 3x3 Eyes or Blue Submarine No. 6) The quality ratings on those UTW-Mazui files are also only comparable among each other, but not with other groups' releases. The v1 and v2 (which already get marked as deprecated files anyway) have been downgraded for lacking embedded fonts, worse typesetting and being based on a Share raw. Yet we have Share raws for the same episode at 2½ or even 3 stars. |
|
|
I concur to everything OP said. And quality being always subjective, it is better set through votes than edits. Any staff opinion on this ? |
|
|
Voting definitely won't happen on a file-level basis; that is asking for trouble. You can already vote for a given anime-release, however; see screenshot "capture.png" I just attached to the ticket. Capture.PNG (39,931 bytes) |
|
|
@CDB-Man That's out of this ticket's scope. And I'm pretty sure everyone was talking about anime group votes. |
|
|
The way I read it, Musaran is suggesting that qualid be a voteable value on a file level basis. I am saying in message 0004037, that this will never happen, and to go use the existing animegroup votes instead. I'm not seeing what's out of scope; I didn't even suggest anything. |
|
|
random commenting on a 2 year old ticket? wat? |
- Anonymous
