View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000239 | HTML & PERL | Feature Request - Database | public | 2005-07-11 20:13 | 2007-08-06 05:07 |
Reporter | DerIdiot | Assigned To | epoximator | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | tweak | Reproducibility | always |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
Summary | 0000239: more grouprelations | ||||
Description | atm we have all sorts of relations mixed together as "parent->child" relation - Renamed (example SSX to AOD) - Fused (can't think of an example right now, but i'm sure there are some) - Split (a-keep -> dp, conclave) - Parent-Child (still needed for things like Triad) this is alos needed for another featurerequest (virtualgroups/stronger group relations) | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
related to | 0000240 | resolved | epoximator | stronger group relations/virtual groups |
|
well, might be nice to have but I don't think we have a real need for this atm. Do we? |
|
someday ... :P |
|
as a suggestion: 1=> participant / includes 2=> parent / child, main group / sub group 3=> renamed to / renamed from, now known as / formerly known as 4=> split from / lost 5=> merged to / 6=> other / weak relation |
|
agreed, signed and sold :P |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2005-07-11 20:13 | DerIdiot | New Issue | |
2005-07-17 16:43 | exp | Note Added: 0000591 | |
2005-07-17 16:43 | exp | Note Added: 0000592 | |
2005-07-17 16:43 | exp | Assigned To | => exp |
2005-07-17 16:43 | exp | Status | new => acknowledged |
2007-05-22 16:21 | DerIdiot | Relationship added | related to 0000240 |
2007-07-11 11:38 | epoximator | Note Added: 0001379 | |
2007-07-11 11:38 | epoximator | Status | acknowledged => assigned |
2007-07-11 11:38 | epoximator | Assigned To | exp => epoximator |
2007-07-23 17:10 | DerIdiot | Note Added: 0001396 | |
2007-08-06 05:07 | epoximator | Status | assigned => resolved |
2007-08-06 05:07 | epoximator | Resolution | open => fixed |